Heartfelt Industries - For all your cigar storage and accessory needs.
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

Perdomo Champagne

Perdomo… You’ve seen my rants of positivity concerning this cigar company. The Champagne is up there on my list of favorite Connecticut wrapped smokes. Many times when I can’t decide what to have, I’ll reach for the Perdomo Champagne. Despite the fancy name, the price isn’t too bad either. For tonight’s review, I am pairing up with water. Let’s see how it goes…

Wrapper: Connecticut aged over 6 years

Binder & Filler: Nicaraguan

Size: Robusto 5×54

Price: Around $5.00

1PerdomoChampagne

Pre-smoke & Construction:

Giving the cigar the ol once over, I found the tan wrapper looked great, with minimal veins. Squeezing the length of the cigar revealed no soft spots. Sniffing the wrapper produced a sweet, rich, woody smell. The foot smelled of a slight spice and natural tobacco. There were no specific flavors on the pre-light draw. Just a sweet tobacco taste. Despite moving around a lot inside and outside, I did no burn corrections, and the ash held for a little over an inch before I had to tap it into the ashtray.

 

Flavor:

As I dug into the first third, the smoke was thick and creamy from the start. Sweet earthy notes followed behind. Next in line was a smooth buttery texture and flavor. On top of everything was a slight sweet spice that was very smooth and easy.

2PerdomoChampagne

The second third saw the body increase slightly, but stayed well within the medium body range. Those familiar buttery and creamy notes continued, while the earthy flavors decreased. The sweet spice held strong and added some pep to the overall flavor profile. Very nice…

3PerdomoChampagne

The last third didn’t offer too much more. That sweet spice kicked up a notch and really kept things from becoming boring. All the while, the thick creamy texture along with buttery notes remained pleasant and up front. I may have detected some slight nuttiness very far back and faint. It was so slight that I may be misdiagnosing that flavor.

4PerdomoChampagne

Conclusion:

You already know my final verdict. This is a good medium anytime of the day cigar. Sure, a lot of the flavors scream of “Another Connecticut wrapped cigar,” but this offered something more that my review is failing to explain. I’d put this over many high dollar cigars. For example, the Macanudo Vintage lines don’t even come close to this $5.00 cigar. Despite that, this cigar is easy enough for the beginner right up to the well seasoned smoker. Go get some!

Tags: ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 9th, 2009 at 12:00 am and is filed under Cigar Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “Perdomo Champagne”

Shaun July 9th, 2009 at 3:00 am

Looks like a great smoke Tom, how would you say this compares to other Medium bodies Connecticut wrapped smokes? Take the RP Vintage 1999 Connecticut for example.

HomeBrewer July 9th, 2009 at 9:06 am

Great stuff as always Tom. I think this is probably my all time favorite Connie wrapped cigar and the price can’t be beat.

Mike - KnightRid July 9th, 2009 at 9:24 am

I like the Champagnes myself! I have a couple 10th anniversary in the humi right now :)

I have had a couple that get really dry after about halfway. I do not know if they need more age, or what, but it wasnt a very nice experience compared to the normal smokes!

Mike

OlivaSerieV July 9th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

I used to smoke the Perdomo Champagne almost everyday(I think I have smoked half a dozen boxes of these already). Then Oliva came out with the Connecticut Reserve and I smoked that everyday for 4 months instead. Then Camacho came out with their Connecticut Figurado and I have been smoking that everyday in its place. Eventually I believe I will rotate my morning connecticut between the Camacho Connecticut Figurado, Oliva Connecticut Reserve Robusto and the Perdomo Champagne Robusto.

Great review keep smoking and pumping out great reviews!

Tom July 9th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

Thanks everyone for the comments!

Shaun – At the moment, if I had to choose, I’d take the Perdomo over the RP. It just seems to have more depth, and its cheaper. Much like the comment from OliveSerieV, I tend to rotate my favorite cigars. So my opinions will probably change.

Mike – Strange… Wonder what is up with the dryness. I don’t recall having that problem. Maybe a little humidor time will help?

CWS July 10th, 2009 at 12:03 pm

Loved the taste and the draw – had huge burn issues, constantly touching up …

Leave a Reply