Bonita Smoke Shop
Powered by MaxBlogPress 

Alcazar No. 3 Maduro

I often overlook the lower shelves at the local cigar shop. A couple of weeks ago, I reached down and randomly grabbed the cigar up for review today. I could find very little information on this smoke, so let’s get to it.

 

Wrapper: Connecticut Maduro

Binder & Filler: Nicaragua

Size: 6 x 50

Price: Around $3.00

1 Alcazar_Maduro cigars

Pre-Smoke & Construction:

The wrapper was a little rugged looking, but overall no major flaws were noticed. I could detect no smell off of the wrapper and foot. Squeezing the cigar revealed some lumps, but nothing extreme. The draw was a bit stiff, and the pre-light flavor reminded me of hay and earthiness.

The ash held firmly for an inch, and the burn required two minor corrections.

2 Alcazar_Maduro cigars

Flavor:

The first half was earthy and had a touch of leather and hay. A slight pepper was noticed when retrohaling, and it stuck around in the aftertaste. The smoke feel was crisp, but to my surprise, it didn’t leave me craving water.

3 Alcazar_Maduro cigars

The last half developed a slight bitter sweetness. It leaned more towards the bitter side though. Like before, earthiness, hay, and a slight leather rounded things out. Pepper remained the same, as did everything else.

4 Alcazar_Maduro cigars

Conclusion:

What can I say… It was a $3.00 cigar. Construction, burn, and ash were good. The flavor was one dimensional. Basically, this is your run of the mill yard gar. As Ed would say, “It was just another cigar…”

Tags: , , ,

This entry was posted on Friday, September 21st, 2012 at 1:00 am and is filed under Cigar Reviews, Value Cigar. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 Responses to “Alcazar No. 3 Maduro”

Robby B September 21st, 2012 at 12:37 pm

It seems to me Tom that their are more “just another cigar” cigars out there the past month I’ve had more so-so cigars

Steve September 22nd, 2012 at 4:42 pm

What’s new Tom? Nice review. Keep up the good work!

Cigarmonkey

Jeff Johnson September 23rd, 2012 at 9:52 am

I tried one of these about 6 months ago. I remember it was very affordable, but with that being said, it was not very memorable. There are too many other sticks out on the market to bother with trying another.

Tom September 23rd, 2012 at 10:07 pm

Robby – Yea, there are ton of regular cigars out there. On the upside, at least this one is cheap.

Steeeeve! – Chillin man! Glad you stopped by.

Jeff – Agreed. The best term I could think of is “Yard gar.” Nothing special for sure.

Giles M September 24th, 2012 at 2:41 pm

Tom, are there any other “cheaper” maduros that you would really recommend buying. Being in college and on a budget, it’s tough to afford and buy the big names. Thanks!

Tom September 24th, 2012 at 8:45 pm

Giles – I’ve noticed that the cheaper maduro cigars tend to not be so good. I’m not exactly sure why, this is just an observation.

You may want to check out some of Perdomo’s cheaper stuff – Nick’s Sticks, Cuban Bullet, stuff like that.

Swede214 September 24th, 2012 at 9:29 pm

Hi Tom, nice review, have not heard of this cigar before, and a question, are you and Ed doing any reviews? It’s been a while, you guys are good together, enjoy watching.

Tom September 27th, 2012 at 8:18 pm

Good question. Yes we are! The quick and dirty answer is part laziness, and part just plain old life getting in the way.

I appreciate the feedback, I think another review with Ed, a guest, and myself is in order.

jjo September 27th, 2012 at 10:11 pm

I’m still waiting on that hippie-hair review with Mike, dammit! Thanks for another budget review – as I’ve said before, a cheap cigar that is worth the price (or more) is always a good thing. Unfortunate that this one was not, for the most part. BTW, that’s one of the shittiest looking bands I’ve ever seen.

As to Giles’ question, I would recommend checking out the Padilla La Terraza Maduro.

Tom October 1st, 2012 at 9:30 pm

JJO – Yea, I gotta get off my ass and get that going. It’s long over due! The review I mean. And yea, the band is very plain, and I wouldn’t care if it made up for it where it counts.

Leave a Reply